
12
SYNDICATE 609 ANNUAL ACCOUNTS 2024
• Using analytical procedures to identify any unusual or
unexpected relationships.
• We communicated identified fraud risks throughout the audit
team and remained alert to any indications of fraud throughout
the audit.
As required by auditing standards, and taking into account possible
pressures to meet profit targets and our overall knowledge of the
control environment we perform procedures to address the risk of
management override of controls, in particular the risk that
management may be in a position to make inappropriate accounting
entries and the risk of bias in accounting estimates and judgements
related to the valuation of claims reserves.
Valuation of these liabilities, especially in respect of the incurred but
not reported (IBNR) component, is highly judgmental as it requires a
number of assumptions to be made such as initial expected loss
ratios and claim development patterns all of which carry high
estimation uncertainty and are difficult to corroborate creating
opportunity for management to commit fraud.
On this audit we do not believe there is a fraud risk related to revenue
recognition because of the limited estimation involved in accruing
premium income. We did not identify any additional fraud risks.
In determining the audit procedures, we took into account the
results of our evaluation and testing of the operating effectiveness of
some of the fraud risk management controls.
We performed procedures including:
• Identifying potential journal entries to test based on risk criteria
and comparing these entries to supporting documentation.
These included entries consisting of unusual double entries to
cash accounts or journals posted by individuals who typically do
not make journal entries.
• We assessed the appropriateness and consistency of the
methods and assumptions used for reserving. For a selection of
classes of business we considered to be higher risk, we
performed alternative projections to the actuarial best estimate
using our own gross loss ratios and compared these to the
syndicate’s results, assessing the results for evidence of bias.
Identifying and responding to risks of material
misstatement related to compliance with laws and
regulations
We identified areas of laws and regulations that could reasonably be
expected to have a material effect on the financial information from
our general commercial and sector experience, through discussion
with the directors and other management (as required by auditing
standards), from inspection of the Managing Agent’s regulatory and
legal correspondence and discussed with the directors and other
management the policies and procedures regarding compliance
with laws and regulations.
As the syndicate is regulated, our assessment of risks involved
gaining an understanding of the control environment including the
entity’s procedures for complying with regulatory requirements.
We communicated identified laws and regulations throughout our
team and remained alert to any indications of non-compliance
throughout the audit.
The potential effect of these laws and regulations on the financial
information varies considerably.
Firstly, the syndicate is subject to laws and regulations that directly
affect the financial information including financial reporting
legislation (such as the Insurance Accounts Directive (Lloyd’s
Syndicate and Aggregate Accounts) Regulations 2008, and the
Lloyd’s Syndicate Accounts Instructions), and we assessed the extent
of compliance with these laws and regulations as part of our
procedures on the related financial information items.
Secondly, the syndicate is subject to many other laws and regulations
where the consequences of non-compliance could have a material
effect on amounts or disclosures in the financial information, for
instance through the imposition of fines or litigation or the loss of the
syndicate’s capacity to operate. We identified the following areas as
those most likely to have such an effect: corruption and bribery,
compliance with regulations relating to sanctions due to the nature
of the business written by the syndicate, financial products and
services regulation and the Solvency II regime including capital
requirements, recognising the financial and regulated nature of the
syndicate’s activities. Auditing standards limit the required audit
procedures to identify non-compliance with these laws and
regulations to enquiry of the directors and other management and
inspection of regulatory and legal correspondence, if any. Therefore, if
a breach of operational regulations is not disclosed to us or evident
from relevant correspondence, an audit will not detect that breach.
Context of the ability of the audit to detect fraud or
breaches of law or regulation
Owing to the inherent limitations of an audit, there is an unavoidable
risk that we may not have detected some material misstatements in
the financial information, even though we have properly planned
and performed our audit in accordance with auditing standards. For
example, the further removed non-compliance with laws and
regulations is from the events and transactions reflected in the
financial information, the less likely the inherently limited procedures
required by auditing standards would identify it.
In addition, as with any audit, there remained a higher risk of
non-detection of fraud, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery,
intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal
controls. Our audit procedures are designed to detect material
misstatement. We are not responsible for preventing non-
compliance or fraud and cannot be expected to detect non-
compliance with all laws and regulations.
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
TO THE MEMBERS OF SYNDICATE 609 CONTINUED